Change log

Implementation Readiness Assessment Report

Date: 2026-04-14 Project: Quorum User: James Scope: Post walkthrough-alignment (Sprint Change Proposal 2026-04-14) readiness re-check.

Step 1 — Document Discovery

PRD Documents

Whole Documents: - prd.md (91KB, modified 2026-04-14)

Sharded Documents: none

Architecture Documents

Whole Documents: - architecture.md (21KB, modified 2026-04-13)

Sharded Documents: none

Epics & Stories Documents

Whole Documents: - epics.md (~43KB, modified 2026-04-14)

Sharded Documents: none

UX Design Documents

Whole Documents (primary): - ux-design-specification.md (26KB, modified 2026-04-14)

Supplementary screen specs (supporting): - ux-screen-spec-step-2b-generated-concepts.md (3.7KB) - ux-screen-spec-step-2c-organize.md (7.1KB)

Sharded Documents: none

Source-of-truth companions

• quorum-pipeline-walkthrough.md (40KB, modified 2026-04-14) — experience-design source of truth, complements PRD's structural quorumPipeline YAML
• sprint-change-proposal-2026-04-14.md — formal change log from this session's Correct Course pass
• walkthrough-alignment-diffs-2026-04-14.md — clean before/after reference for all 52 walkthrough-alignment edits

Issues

Duplicates: None — only whole documents exist.

Missing: None of the required four document types are missing.

Stale: implementation-readiness-report-2026-04-12.md exists but is explicitly superseded by this report.

Step 2 — PRD Analysis

Functional Requirements Extracted

Workspace & access (FR1–FR6) - FR1: User can create and name a workspace for a product effort. - FR2: User can authenticate and be associated with one or more workspaces. - FR3: Workspace owner can invite members and assign roles with differentiated permissions. - FR4: User can perform only actions permitted by their role within a workspace. - FR5: System enforces isolation of data and artifacts between workspaces. - FR6: User can leave or be removed from a workspace according to role rules.

Team room & human-in-the-loop decisions (FR7–FR13) - FR7: User can interact with the AI product team through a conversational team room. - FR8: User can see which agent personas are active for the current pipeline step. - FR9: User can open and navigate workspace artifacts alongside the conversation. - FR10: Agents can surface conflicting assessments and structured trade-offs for user resolution. - FR11: User can request clarification on agent reasoning during pipeline steps. - FR12: Product can record user decisions on contested recommendations. - FR13: User can resume work from a saved pipeline checkpoint.

Vision ideation & concept design (FR14–FR18, FR46) - FR14: Full-team structured ideation session running the 8-category Kitchen Sink Discovery Framework → four structured deliverables (Problem/Solution Framing, Features & Capabilities, Master Design Prompt, per-Screen Prompts). - FR15: Tool-agnostic design prompt handoff — downloadable as Doc, HTML, and/or PDF. - FR16: Directional aesthetic alignment without full design system. - FR17: Associate initial concept visuals with features and flows. - FR18: Update concept visual references as vision evolves. - FR46: Generated Concepts — scroll/browse variations covering full product surface, select baseline (retain alternates), refine via NL or breakout window, carry results back.

Organization & three-pillar filter (FR19–FR25, FR25a) - FR19: Full product sitemap + themed groupings with dependencies for user confirmation. - FR20: User can edit or confirm organized groupings before analysis. - FR21: Three-pillar evaluation with two modes — Collaborate / Let AI handle it. - FR22: Evidence, sources, rationale visible on pillar conclusions. - FR23: Dispute pillar conclusions and receive further agent analysis. - FR24: Concept representations reflect filter-driven scope changes. - FR25: Finalize acceptance or override with rationale retained. - FR25a (NEW): Per-pillar rankings + overall combined ranking + MVP/V2/V3 release allocation with reasoning.

Planning artifacts & traceability (FR26–FR32) - FR26: PRD as HTML and Word (.docx) from same source. - FR27: Journey maps (user + customer flows). - FR28: Refinement pass — journey update + screen/content refresh + tokens + design system + fix-up design prompt + Doc/HTML exports. - FR29: Motion/interaction specs — delivered as text + HTML with reduced-motion alternatives. - FR30: Roadmap and cost estimates with motion scope included. - FR31: Pitch/executive narrative — user-refined (design + content) — exported PDF, DOC, HTML. - FR32: Cross-artifact navigation sharing consistent scope state.

Sprint planning & implementation handoff (FR33–FR37) - FR33: Epics and stories with acceptance criteria from approved scope. - FR34: Stories carry design + motion artifact references. - FR35: Story export for external AI coding tools. - FR36: Record implementation progress against stories. - FR37: Backend-related planning when required.

Quality, security & user acceptance (FR38–FR41) - FR38: QA flows tied to story acceptance criteria. - FR39: Security review pass required before release declaration. - FR40: Acceptance review vs design and motion intent. - FR41: Mark release blocked/unblocked per security and quality policy.

Administration, usage & integrations (FR42–FR45) - FR42: Configure subscription tier limits and seat allocation. - FR43: V1 external work-tracking/knowledge integration. - FR44: View usage relative to subscription limits. - FR45: Append-only audit history of security-sensitive actions.

Portfolio documentation (FR47, NEW) - FR47 (NEW): Portfolio Document summarizing end-to-end process — exported as HTML, PDF, and Doc — suitable for portfolio/case-study/retrospective.

Total FRs: 48 (FR1–FR47 plus FR25a)

Non-Functional Requirements Extracted

Performance (NFR-P1–P4) - NFR-P1: Sub-second perceived response for cached reads; operations >2s P95 show progress or streaming. - NFR-P2: Multi-step agent workflows surface incremental progress (no >10s blind wait). - NFR-P3: Heavy jobs (three-pillar, large organize, bulk export) may run async with durable status; UI shows queued/running/failed. - NFR-P4: PRD HTML/Word generation completes within documented upper bound or degrades gracefully.

Security & privacy (NFR-S1–S6) - NFR-S1: Logical workspace isolation; no cross-tenant access via normal APIs. - NFR-S2: TLS in production; sensitive config not in client-visible logs. - NFR-S3: Industry-baseline authN/Z; RBAC alignment with FR3–FR4. - NFR-S4: Cipher findings map to severity, remediation state, block-ship rules. - NFR-S5: Tenant data export/deletion to GDPR-aligned baseline. - NFR-S6: Security-sensitive actions append-only auditable (actor, timestamp, workspace).

Scalability & reliability (NFR-R1–R4) - NFR-R1: Horizontal scaling + partitioned persistence (no manual resharding V1–V2). - NFR-R2: Concurrent multi-user work without silent data loss; conflicts detected and surfaced. - NFR-R3: Per-tenant session + token usage metered for billing/fairness. - NFR-R4: Target uptime SLO defined pre-GA; incident comms for enterprise.

Accessibility (NFR-A1–A2) - NFR-A1: WCAG 2.1 AA for core conductor flows in V1 or documented phased plan. - NFR-A2: Reduced-motion preference respected for product-controlled UI.

Integration & interoperability (NFR-I1–I3) - NFR-I1: Story artifacts validate against published schema version + metadata. - NFR-I2: Integrations handle rate limits, timeouts, partial failure with retry-safe behavior. - NFR-I3: Design-tool handoff preserves stable references (URL + workspace association).

Observability & operations (NFR-O1–O2) - NFR-O1: Structured logs/metrics sufficient to debug tenant issues without cross-tenant exposure. - NFR-O2: Alerting on critical background job failure rates and queue backlog.

Total NFRs: 19

Additional Requirements Extracted

Architecture constraints (ARCH-1 through ARCH-9) — from architecture.md, cross-referenced in epics.md: - ARCH-1: Next.js App Router app per create-next-app pattern. - ARCH-2: PostgreSQL + Prisma (or documented alt) with workspace_id tenant scoping. - ARCH-3: Managed auth (Clerk/Auth0/Better Auth) with RBAC on mutating routes. - ARCH-4: LangGraph (TypeScript) orchestration with checkpoint/resume persistence. - ARCH-5: Job runner for long-running analysis + exports. - ARCH-6: S3-compatible object storage for large artifacts/exports. - ARCH-7: API error envelope + JSON field naming per architecture patterns. - ARCH-8: Structured logs with workspace + request id; OTel-compatible tracing where adopted. - ARCH-9: LLM provider abstraction for tiered models + metering (NFR-R3).

UX Design Requirements (UX-DR1 through UX-DR16) — from ux-design-specification.md via epics.md: 16 UX design requirements covering shell, roster, streaming, evidence cards, override modal, checkpoint resume, semantic tokens, phase chip, sprint board, settings, WCAG, full methodology rail, pillar education, rail density, multi-concept handoff, Generated Concepts surface.

PRD Completeness Assessment

Strengths: - All functional capabilities now map to explicit, testable FRs post-walkthrough-alignment. - Pipeline YAML (visionDiscovery.quorumPipeline) is complete through Step 13 and matches the experience-design walkthrough. - FR numbering is coherent; new additions (FR25a, FR47) slot in cleanly without renumbering disruption. - NFRs cover all relevant non-functional categories; performance targets have measurable thresholds (sub-second, 2s P95, 10s agent-turn).

Observed gaps / watch-items (carry forward to Step 3): - FR25a uses an a suffix rather than a new integer to preserve surrounding numbering — technically sound, but downstream tooling or docs that assume integer-only FR IDs may need adjustment. - NFR-R4 uptime SLO is deferred to pre-GA definition — acceptable per PRD convention, but not yet concrete. - NFR-P4 PRD export upper bound is "documented per tier" but tier-specific values are still TBD. - ARCH constraints live in architecture.md; story-level validation will confirm they are surfaced in story ACs. - UX-DR items are scoped in ux-design-specification.md; epic-level coverage will be validated against story-level ACs in Step 3.

Step 3 — Epic Coverage Validation

Coverage Matrix (FR → Story)

Coverage Statistics

• Total PRD FRs: 48 (FR1–FR47 + FR25a)
• FRs covered in epics: 48
• Coverage percentage: 100%
• Missing FRs: None
• Orphan stories (stories with no PRD FR): Story 1.1 (scaffold — maps to ARCH-1..3, which are legitimate architectural constraints tracked separately, not FR orphans)

Reverse Check (Epic claims → PRD)

No epic claims an FR that doesn't exist in the PRD.

Coverage Validation Summary

Pass. Every FR has at least one story; every story's FR claim is valid; no gaps in either direction.

Note: FR25a (non-standard suffix) and FR47 (new) — both added in the 2026-04-14 walkthrough alignment — have coverage via newly-created stories (4.6, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3). New Epic 9 (Portfolio document output) is correctly registered in the epic list and FR coverage map.

Step 4 — UX Alignment

UX Document Status

Found. Primary: ux-design-specification.md (26KB, 2026-04-14). Supplementary: ux-screen-spec-step-2b-generated-concepts.md, ux-screen-spec-step-2c-organize.md.

UX ↔ PRD Alignment

Strong alignment. UX spec §15 provides an explicit traceability map from UX areas to FRs/UX-DRs. Post-alignment additions are reflected:

Watch-items (low priority): Refinement exports (FR28), motion export formats (FR29), and pitch three-format export (FR31) are correctly implemented in stories but UX spec's component/flow treatment is implicit. Non-blocking — ExportMenu generalizes the concern.

UX ↔ Architecture Alignment

Architecture Freshness Notes (informational, non-blocking)

architecture.md has two references that pre-date the walkthrough alignment and could be refreshed opportunistically:

1. FR coverage map (§"Requirements Coverage Validation") reads "FR1–FR46" — should be "FR1–FR47 + FR25a" post-alignment.
2. Gap Analysis flags "No UX spec file yet" as Critical — this is stale; UX spec now exists.

These are documentation-freshness items rather than architectural gaps. No story currently blocked by them. Recommend a light housekeeping pass on architecture.md before the next major planning session, but not required for readiness.

Warnings

None blocking.

Soft flags: - UX spec could tighten component coverage for refinement exports, motion exports, and pitch exports — all currently covered by generalized ExportMenu behavior and story ACs, so low risk. - architecture.md contains two stale references to pre-alignment state; informational only.

Step 5 — Epic Quality Review

Epic-Level Structural Validation

Epic Independence Rule: No epic requires a later epic to function. ✅ PASS.

Technical-milestone check: No "Setup Database", "API Development", or "Infrastructure Setup" epics exist. All epics are user-value framed. ✅ PASS.

Story Quality Spot-Check (Emphasis on Newly Added / Modified)

Pre-existing stories (Story 1.2–1.7, 2.1–2.8, 3.2, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8, 4.2–4.5, 5.1–5.3, 5.6, 6.1–6.5, 7.1–7.4, 8.1–8.4) retain their prior G/W/T structure from 2026-04-12 authoring pass; none were regressed by this alignment.

Forward-Dependency Check

Ran ACs for any "depends on future story" or "wait for future story" patterns.

Findings: None detected. All within-epic dependencies flow forward (later stories consume earlier stories' output, never the reverse).

Specific inspections: - Story 2.8 (checkpoint resume) — references FR13 checkpoint persistence; assumes checkpoint state model is available. Story does not reference a later story as its source. ✅ - Story 3.7 (sitemap + themes) uses "2b handoff bundle" from Story 3.4. Story 3.4 precedes 3.7 within Epic 3. ✅ - Story 4.6 (release allocation) uses step 3 analysis output from Stories 4.1–4.5. Appropriate sequence. ✅ - Story 9.1 (portfolio) synthesizes outputs from Epics 3–7. All feed from earlier epics; Epic 9 is last. ✅

Database/Entity Creation Timing

Story 1.1 scaffolds the application (TypeScript, App Router, Tailwind, Prisma client capable of pointing at Postgres) — it does not create all tables upfront. Downstream stories create their own entities as needed:

• Story 1.2 (workspace create) → introduces workspaces table
• Story 1.3 (auth + membership) → introduces members/roles as needed
• Story 1.4 (invites) → invite entity when the story runs
• Story 1.5 (RBAC enforcement) → policy tables when the story runs
• Story 1.6 (tenant isolation) → verified via Story 1.2's scope
• etc.

✅ PASS on just-in-time schema introduction.

Starter Template Requirement

Architecture (ARCH-1) specifies create-next-app (Next.js App Router). Epic 1 Story 1.1 is exactly a "Set up initial project from starter template" story.

✅ PASS.

Issues by Severity

🔴 Critical Violations: None.

🟠 Major Issues: None.

🟡 Minor Concerns:

1. FR25a non-standard numbering — uses a suffix rather than a new integer (e.g., FR46 style). Technically sound and preserves surrounding numbering without renumbering ripple, but any tooling or downstream doc that assumes integer-only FR IDs may need adjustment. Consider standardizing on plain integer numbering in a future cleanup pass, but not required for build readiness.
2. architecture.md stale references (already flagged in Step 4) — FR range says "FR1–FR46" and Gap Analysis flags a non-existent "missing UX spec." Informational; does not block any story.
3. UX spec refinement-export / motion-export / pitch-export component coverage (flagged in Step 4) — stories fully cover these capabilities; UX spec treats them via generalized ExportMenu. Low risk; consider tightening in a UX-spec housekeeping pass.

Best Practices Compliance — Per-Epic Checklist

Epic Quality Summary

Pass. No critical or major violations. Three minor concerns documented above, none blocking build readiness.

Step 6 — Final Assessment

Overall Readiness Status

READY.

All four canonical artifacts (PRD, Architecture, Epics, UX Spec) are complete, internally consistent, and aligned with the experience-design source of truth (quorum-pipeline-walkthrough.md). 100% FR coverage. No critical or major epic-quality violations. Starter-template requirement satisfied. JIT schema introduction enforced. No forward dependencies.

Readiness Score Card

Critical Issues Requiring Immediate Action

None.

Issues Logged (Minor, Non-Blocking)

1. architecture.md freshness — two references pre-date the walkthrough alignment: - FR coverage map says "FR1–FR46"; should be "FR1–FR47 + FR25a" - Gap Analysis flags "No UX spec file yet"; stale — UX spec exists - Recommendation: housekeeping pass on architecture.md before next major planning session.

2. FR25a non-standard numbering — uses a suffix instead of incrementing to FR48. Preserves surrounding numbering without ripple but may confuse tooling that assumes integer-only FR IDs. - Recommendation: accept as-is for now; consider standardization pass later.

3. UX spec component granularity for exports — Refinement exports (FR28), motion text/HTML exports (FR29), and pitch three-format export (FR31) are covered by generalized ExportMenu behavior and story ACs, but the UX spec does not call them out explicitly per step. - Recommendation: tighten in a UX-spec housekeeping pass; low risk for build.

Recommended Next Steps

1. Proceed to sprint planning (bmad-sprint-planning) — readiness passes; epics are ready to enter the sprint status tracker.
2. (Optional) Housekeeping pass on architecture.md — refresh FR range and drop the stale UX-missing flag. 15-minute task.
3. (Optional) UX-spec export component pass — add explicit components or flow notes for refinement/motion/pitch export formats. 30-minute task.
4. Begin build — Epic 1 Story 1.1 (Application scaffold per architecture) is the entry point. All subsequent stories follow the approved sequence.

Final Note

This assessment found 0 critical, 0 major, and 3 minor issues across the six validation dimensions. None block implementation. The 2026-04-14 walkthrough-alignment pass (Sprint Change Proposal + 52 edits) successfully brought the canonical artifacts into alignment with the enriched walkthrough; readiness is now re-certified.

You may proceed to implementation.

Report generated: _bmad-output/planning-artifacts/implementation-readiness-report-2026-04-14.md Supersedes: implementation-readiness-report-2026-04-12.md Companion docs: sprint-change-proposal-2026-04-14.md, walkthrough-alignment-diffs-2026-04-14.md, quorum-pipeline-walkthrough.md Next workflow: bmad-sprint-planning